Compare
All-on-6: Vietnam vs Turkey — 2026 AUD comparison
Picasso All-on-6 AUD 10,175–16,955/arch vs Istanbul AUD 8,000–15,000/arch. Flight time, implant brand quality, and aftercare for Australian patients.
All-on-6 uses six implants per arch compared to All-on-4's four, improving force distribution and long-term stability for patients with adequate posterior bone volume. Picasso Dental Clinic in Ho Chi Minh City charges AUD 10,175–16,955 per arch for All-on-6; Istanbul clinics range from AUD 8,000–15,000 depending on implant brand and bridge material. At comparable implant quality, pricing is close — but Australians face a 14–16 hour flight to Istanbul versus 8–9 hours to Ho Chi Minh City. For All-on-6 patients making the commitment to overseas full-arch reconstruction, Vietnam's combination of equivalent surgical standards, internationally documented implant systems, and substantially shorter travel time makes it the more practical choice for Australians.
Price comparison: All-on-6 in Vietnam, Turkey, and Australia
| Provider tier | Per arch (6 implants + bridge) |
|---|---|
| Picasso Dental Clinic, Ho Chi Minh City | AUD 10,175–16,955 |
| Istanbul top-tier (international implant brands) | AUD 10,000–15,000 |
| Istanbul mid-range (mixed brand use) | AUD 7,000–10,000 |
| Australian private clinic benchmark | AUD 28,000–50,000 |
At the premium tier using international implant brands, Picasso and Istanbul’s top clinics are priced in a similar range. The lower end of Istanbul’s market reflects entry-level brands and compromised bridge materials. Always verify what is included in an Istanbul All-on-6 quote.
Flight comparison from Sydney and Melbourne
| Route | Flight time |
|---|---|
| SYD to Ho Chi Minh City (SGN) | 8–9 hours (direct) |
| MEL to Ho Chi Minh City (SGN) | 8–9 hours (direct) |
| SYD to Istanbul (IST) | 14–16 hours (1 stop) |
| MEL to Istanbul (IST) | 14–16 hours (1 stop) |
For Australians committing to major jaw reconstruction, the 6–8 hour flight time differential per sector is a material quality-of-life consideration — particularly during post-surgical recovery.
Implant brand documentation: a long-term concern
All-on-6 fixtures are permanent components. If a crown, abutment, or connecting element needs replacement in Australia 5 or 10 years from now, your Australian prosthodontist needs to source compatible components from the original implant manufacturer. Osstem, Nobel Biocare, and Straumann have extensive international distribution networks and are used routinely in Australian specialist practices. Entry-level Istanbul brands used in tourist-facing clinics may not have Australian distributors — meaning your Australian dentist cannot source compatible parts.
Picasso documents the implant brand, model, and batch number for every patient, with copies of this documentation provided for the patient’s Australian dental records.
Bridge material comparison
The definitive All-on-6 bridge — whether full-arch zirconia, layered zirconia-porcelain, or PMMA — is a significant component of total cost and long-term durability. At both Picasso and Istanbul’s reputable clinics, zirconia is the preferred material for its strength, ease of cleaning, and longevity. Confirm that a full zirconia bridge is included in any All-on-6 quote you receive, not just an acrylic or PMMA provisional.
When to choose each destination
Choose Picasso, Ho Chi Minh City if:
- All-on-6 is your treatment plan and you want the most practical travel logistics from Australia
- You want implant brand documentation compatible with Australian specialist practices
- You want clear itemised pricing covering all components of the treatment
Consider Istanbul only if:
- You have a verified referral to a specific Istanbul oral surgery specialist using international implant brands
- You are combining this with a broader Europe or Middle East travel plan
Related pages
- Vietnam vs Turkey dental tourism hub
- All-on-6 at Picasso Dental Clinic
- All-on-4: Vietnam vs Turkey
- Full mouth reconstruction: Vietnam vs Turkey
Frequently asked questions
Why might a surgeon recommend All-on-6 over All-on-4?
All-on-4 uses angulated posterior implants to avoid anatomical structures (sinus floor, inferior alveolar nerve) and maximise bone contact with available bone. All-on-6 places six upright implants, distributing bite forces more evenly across the arch. Surgeons may recommend All-on-6 when bone volume in the posterior jaw is adequate, when the patient has high bite forces (parafunctional habits), or when the clinical assessment suggests a six-point support structure is preferable for long-term prosthetic stability. Both protocols can support a full-arch fixed bridge — this is a clinical decision based on your CBCT scan.
Does Istanbul offer All-on-6, or is it mostly All-on-4?
Istanbul's major implant clinics offer All-on-6 as a standard option. The procedure is more common at specialist oral surgery centres than at general dental practices. As with All-on-4, the critical variables are the implant brand tier and the bridge material. Be especially cautious of All-on-6 quotes from Istanbul that are significantly cheaper than Picasso — the saving usually reflects brand substitution or exclusion of the definitive ceramic bridge from the quote.
How do I plan a two-trip All-on-6 itinerary from Australia?
For a two-trip All-on-6 protocol from Australia, Vietnam requires 4 direct flight sectors of 8–9 hours each (approximately 32–36 total flight hours). Turkey requires 4 sectors of 14–16 hours each through a hub (approximately 56–64 total flight hours). Factoring in transit time and recovery after major jaw surgery, the travel burden difference is significant. Picasso's treatment team coordinates trip 1 (surgery, immediate bridge) and trip 2 (definitive bridge, 3–6 months later) to minimise time away from work.